India released its 2007 Green House Gas inventory few days back. I
think it has some big problems with the transport estimates. It claims that the
“road
transport sector emitted 123.55 million tons of CO2e, which is 87% of the total
emissions from the transport sector”.
The transport sector emissions include all GHG emissions from road transport,
railways, aviation and navigation. It suggests that “the total number of registered
vehicles in the country has increased from 5.4 million in 1981 to 99.6 million
in 2007. Two wheelers and cars constitute nearly 88% of the total vehicles at
the national level”.
The problem with the total numbers of vehicles in India is that
registered vehicles cannot be used for estimates as we don’t have active
scrappage/renewal system. Not many people have
an idea as to how to guess the number of vehicles on road. Even the activity information (vehicle
travel/year in km) is not available on public domain and often people borrow
the numbers from some isolated studies and from other countries or other
researchers.
In order to
highlight the data issues, following are some of the critical issues
·
Vehicles
o
No
breakdown by mode type and engine technology (e.g. Euro 1 or Euro 2 compliant,
etc.)
o
limited
data on active vehicle fleet
o
No data on
splitting small cars with big cars, MUV’s, LCV’s
o
Isolated
surveys to determine age of the vehicles
·
Fuels
o
No fuel
split available - gasoline, diesel, alternative fuel
·
Activity
o
No data on
urban vs rural share of movement
o
Occupancy
– how many people/load
o
Annual
surveys and proper methodologies on vehicle-km travelled, passenger-km
travelled, and tonnes-km rarely exist
o
Reasonable
data on fuel consumption per km travelled on various transport modes. This
issue is critical as quoted values from lab testing differs from actual on road
values
·
Emission
factors:
o
lack of
locally representative emission factors for existing vehicle fleet
Coming back on the India’s 2007 estimate of 123 million tons in
2007 for an activity information of 99 million vehicles is too low as seen from
the attached graphic. In fact the estimates of CO2 /vehicles is
lesser (1.2) than what researchers have quantified for passenger transport
(ratio of 1.5 for passenger vehicles. Including commercial vehicles in estimation
would expand this figure to a range of 2 to 4). Strangely, the same authors, in
an earlier study had quantified 106 million tons in 2000 with 48 million
vehicles. Then why is that the doubling of vehicle numbers not showing impact?
One thing that hits hard in the below graphic is the huge variation
of CO2 and vehicles. It seems that researchers do not agree with
each other … a classic case of elephant and the
blind men
! It's a high time that governments resolve these kinds of data issues by
improving the collection and survey procedures. One needs a strong institution
for collecting the information from various sources annually and derive
insights and it needs to be backed by sound budget.
Have a look at the attachment!!
1133 days ago
Hi Sudhir,
The points you make are very valid, indeed scrappage is not recorded in India, nor in most other Asian countries.
However, I just wanted to point out that some of the data you mention we do have available for all Asian countries including:
- the breakdown by mode type and engine technology (e.g. Euro 1 or Euro 2 compliant, etc.)
- the split of small cars and big cars, MUV’s, LCV’s, etc.
- fuel split available - gasoline, diesel, alternative fuel
The above data can be provided even with further technical details.
As for age breakdown, we have very good indications which have been thoroughly researched and validated.
With kind regards,
Fionna Prins
Segment Y
www.segmenty.com
1130 days ago
Dear Fionna,
Thanks - it is great to hear that you have the data for various Asian countries. The problem is however that this data is not in the public domain at the moment unless I am mistaken. In that case please share with us where we can find the data.
I would like to ask your, and the other COPer's, attention for the attached submission we made on transport data to CSD 18. Based on this we expect to see a continued discussion this year which will lead hopefully to a better availability and quality of transport data.
Over the last months the Inter American Development Bank has conducted a survey of transport data in Latin America, and ADB is starting something similar shortly.
In the data submission to CSD 18.we acknowledge the role that private sector operators like Segment Y play in transport data: "To promote the participation of private operators to register and make public the data they currently gather, while protecting their commercial interest;"
Cornie
1130 days ago
Hi Cornie and Fionna,
I agree with Cornie. The data should be freely available to the public as it has implications on the policy issue. We need to make the black-box transparent. It's the National governments duty to make available good quality data to the researchers and local level policy makers. There may a role for the consultants and reputed organizations like segment “Y” but then one needs to make long term plans. Insolated surveys and one time efforts will not help. Institutional, capacity and funding issues need more attention. The information flow should be both top down and bottom-up and there should be mechanism where an institution derives the insights by making the records public - free of cost. This is the only way to make credible forecasts.
Sudhir